Who was a substitute acting for - at workitem execution

[Dart, Jocelyn]

Sue,
This information is not kept and often the substitution entries are deleted afterwards.
One option may be to use an "after method" to capture the actual agent versus the selected agents
at step completion.  In a 6.20 system you can use the rule_result parameter to capture the originally
selected agents.
Regards,
        Jocelyn Dart
Consultant (SRM, EBP, Workflow)
and co-author of the book
"Practical Workflow for SAP"
SAP Australia
email: jocelyn.dart at sap.com
phone: +61 412 390 267
fax:   +61 2 9935 4880
 
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Kjetil Kilhavn [mailto:kjetilk at statoil.com]
Sent: Monday,1 September 2003 6:30 PM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Who was a substitute acting for - at workitem execution
 
 
Sorry that the response time is unacceptably slow, but I have been on
"holidays" the last two months (and I couldn't find any conclusive
responses in this thread).
 
How would the system be able to determine this information? I am not very
familiar with substitutions since we rarely use the feature, but as far as
I have understood one user can substitute for many other users and many
users can be substitutes for one user. Thus it seems impossible for the
system to have an algorithm with which the information could be determined.
--
Kjetil Kilhavn
 
 
 
 
 
                    "Susan R. Keohan"
                    <skeohan at mit.edu>           To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
                    Sent by: SAP                cc:     (bcc: Kjetil Kilhavn)
                    Workflow                    Subject:     Re: Who was a substitute acting for - at workitem execution
                    <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVM
                    A.MIT.EDU>
 
 
                    15.07.2003 20:06
                    Please respond to
                    "SAP Workflow Users'
                    Group"
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hi Maorriyan,
 
My problem isn't seeing who is set up for substitution, but seeing by a
specific workitem, who the
executor was substituting for.  I suppose a clever person could find a way
to merge the info in
HRUS_D2, or as Flavio suggested, run the role resolution, but I was hoping
this information was
stored in an SAP table somewhere, linked to the workitem ID.
 
Thanks
Sue
 
Maorriyan wrote:
> Hi..Susan
> Someone ever told me, you can use table HRUS_D2.
>
>  Regards,
>
> Maorriyan
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Susan R. Keohan <mailto:skeohan at mit.edu>
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU <mailto:SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:52 PM
> Subject: Who was a substitute acting for - at workitem execution
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a requirement to find out who a particular user was acting for
> (as a substitute) when they
> execute a specific workitem.  I already know how to see what substitutes
> are set up, but was hoping
> to find something in a workflow log file that would tell me "at the time
> this workitem was executed,
> user B was acting as a substitute for user A".
>
> Any help will be greatly appreciated.
> --
> Susan R. Keohan
> SAP Workflow Developer
> MIT Lincoln Laboratory
> 244 Wood Street
> LI-200
> Lexington, MA. 02420
> 781-981-3561
> skeohan at mit.edu <mailto:skeohan at mit.edu>
 
 
--
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Developer
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
skeohan at mit.edu
 
 
 
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.