Role Responsibilies with boolean

[Robert.vande.Berg@nuon.com]

Option 3
==============
 3) You can assign a higher priority to the responsibility with value
'X' than to a responsibility for all values ('*' I believe).
==============
I have tried that, but then there is a problem with the determination.
I tried:
Responsibility BOOLEAN FROM X TO X, (BOOLEAN = TRUE) Priority 01.
Responsibility BOOLEAN FROM   TO X, (BOOLEAN = FALSE & BOOLEAN = TRUE),
Priority 99
When I test the role with ' '(BOOLEAN = FALSE), the role works fine!
When I test the role with  X  (BOOLEAN = TRUE), the role exits without
returning the agents..
 
Option 2 with allowed values:
THIS WORKS!!!
Responsibility BOOLEAN FROM X TO X, (BOOLEAN = TRUE) Priority 01.
Responsibility BOOLEAN FROM Y TO  , (BOOLEAN = FALSE), Priority 99.
 
So a BOOLEAN element can be checked with the value 'Y'....
SAP??? ;-D
 
Thanx very much!!
 
regards,
Robert
 
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Menne de Jong [mailto:menne.de.jong at arinso.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 11 november 2003 13:18
Aan: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: Role Responsibilies with boolean
 
 
- Is option 3) not an option?
- With opption 2) does the responsibility editor check on allowed values (I
forgot)?
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert.vande.Berg at nuon.com
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Sent: 11/11/2003 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: Role Responsibilies with boolean
 
This I understand, but I have declared the container element as BOOLE -
BOOLE in all my workflowtasks (approx. 45), so I want it to work with a
boolean.
 
I know that I kan change the containter element type to CHAR so I can
check
on this, but this resultes in an adjustment to all the 45
workflowtasks...
 
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Menne de Jong [mailto:menne.de.jong at arinso.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 11 november 2003 13:05
Aan: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: Role Responsibilies with boolean
 
 
 1) You can also check on ' ' - 'W' and 'Y' - 'Z' fpor values other than
'X';
 
 2) You can use also a character ('N' f.e.) for values other than 'X':
but
you would have to change the values also in the workflow;
 
 3) You can assign a higher priority to the responsibility with value
'X'
than to a responsibility for all values ('*' I believe).
 
Menne
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert.vande.Berg at nuon.com
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Sent: 11/11/2003 11:53 AM
Subject: Role Responsibilies with boolean
 
All,
 
System: IS-U
Version: 4.6.4
AOSP 17
 
I have created a Standard Role type Responsibilities which looks at the
value of a boolean container element.
What I want:
If the boolean is FALSE (no X), then to users 1, 2, 3.
If the boolean is TRUE (X), then to users 4, 5, 6.
 
Problem:
Responsibility BOOLEAN FROM X TO X, (BOOLEAN = TRUE) SAP goes along.
Responsibility BOOLEAN FROM   TO X, (BOOLEAN = FALSE & BOOLEAN = TRUE,
all
cases) SAP goes along.
Responsibility BOOLEAN FROM   TO  , (BOOLEAN = FALSE) SAP says 'No
Responsibilities defined'.
 
Does the responsibility has to have a value or is it possible to check
on
the containerelement to be empty (in case of FALSE boolean)
 
Thanks!
 
Robert van den Berg