Method Execution not carried out after call transaction

Swami Bala swam_in at hotmail.com
Fri Jan 31 14:52:36 EST 2003


Thanks Lola. The method is in fact synchronous.
 
Swami Bala
 
 
 
 
 
>From: Lola Oluwa <Lola.Oluwa at outokumpu.net>
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: Method Execution not carried out after call transaction
>Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:39:12 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.0.109]) by
>mc6-f2.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Fri, 31 Jan
>2003 00:45:35 -0800
>Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com
>(LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id
><6.008C1CE9 at cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 3:45:29 -0500
>Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
>1.8e)          with spool id 7408 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 31 Jan
>2003          03:45:09 -0500
>Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP at MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
>      V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 7194; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 03:44:12 -0500
>Received: from fiesdmz5.outokumpu.com [192.89.135.52] by mitvma.mit.edu
>(IBM VM          SMTP Level 320) via TCP with ESMTP ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003
>03:44:11 EST
>Received: from espox005.okno.outokumpu.com (espox005.okno.outokumpu.com
>      [158.131.8.51]) by fiesdmz5.outokumpu.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP
>         id h0V8iHoS000131 for <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>; Fri, 31 Jan 2003
>        10:44:17 +0200 (EET)
>X-Message-Info: dHZMQeBBv44lPE7o4B5bAg==
>X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by fiesdmz5.outokumpu.com
>X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.9a  January 7, 2002
>X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ESPOX005/Outokumpu Corp.(Release 5.0.9a
>             |January 7, 2002) at 31.01.2003 10:44:17
>Approved-By:  Lola.Oluwa at OUTOKUMPU.NET
>Message-ID:
><OF0B79A51E.972FA933-ONC2256CBF.002D218C-C2256CBF.002FFF2C at okno.outokumpu.com>
>Sender:       SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>Precedence: list
>Return-Path: owner-sap-wug at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jan 2003 08:45:35.0218 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[1F042520:01C2C905]
>
>Hi Swami,
>The one  thing to check is if your task is an asynchronous task (using an
>asynchronous method). If it is you cannot expect to immidiately return to
>the line in your source code after the call transaction ... You can read
>more from documentation.
>If you want to do further processing after a call transaction, it will be
>better to use a synchronous method...
>
>Hope this helps.
>
>Lola.
>
>
>
>                       Swam_in
>                       <swam_in at hotmail.co         To:
>SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>                       m>                          cc:      (bcc: Lola
>Oluwa/Outokumpuext)
>                       Sent by: SAP                Subject: Method
>Execution not carried out after call transaction
>                       Workflow
>                       <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITV
>                       MA.MIT.EDU>
>
>
>                       31.01.2003 09:50
>                       Please respond to
>                       "SAP Workflow
>                       Users' Group"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hello All,
>
>I have a 'Call transaction' within a method . When the user double clicks
>on the Inbox workitem the call transaction is called perfectely. After the
>transaction is called the source code is skipped ( I believe ). Because the
>source code
>is not executed and I am not getting expected results. But the things are
>working fine if I put a break point in the
>source code after the call transaction or 'Wait' command. I have
>implemented and released the method correctly including the object type.
>Does anybody has come across such a situation ? We are in 46c.
>Any help is appreciated.
>Swami Bala
 
 
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
 


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list