structural organization - relationships

[Sandra Contreras]

Hi Phil,
 
I really apreciate your help, we reviewed the tables and the HR
configuration,  it's working.
 
Now I have another question.  if I saw the trans SWI2_FREQ the work item
doesn't have the user2 as possible agent, anyway in his inbox there are the
work item.  It's that normal or I must to see the agent??
It's very important for us know who is the agent because we use the funds
reservation multivalidtn workflow.
 
thanks again.
 
 
 
Sandra
 
 
 
 
 
 
>From: "Soady, Phil" <phil.soady at sap.com>
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: structural organization - relationships
>Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 02:32:08 +0100
>
>Hi Sandra ,
>
>The Inbox of Person X is visible to Person Y when,
>
>
>(S)position S1 has holder --> 008 (P) person P1 --> Infty 0105 (US)  US1
>This position may be vacant
>         008 is no longer active (no holder)
>
>In Trans PP01
>(S) position S1 --> A210 (P) Person2  -> Infty 0105 (US) Us2.
>                 Pay attention to the detail screen.
>                 ACTIVE FLAG should be ON.
>         and   set profile to ALL or something appropriate.
>
>
>
>USer 2 can see tasks assigned to position 1.
>NOTE: Make the agent of task (S1) since there is no HOLDER (P1).
>or P1 is no longer linked to S1.
>
>
>If P1 is not the assigned holder of S1 then if the task is assigned to P1
>or US1 you will NOT see the substitution work.
>If (P1) is still the holder of position, the substitution will still be
>visible to US2 if the agent of task was P1.
>
>If you are still having problems,
>check tables t77tc, t77ro and t77rp.
>
>It is possible the default classification ALL isnt working / been changed
>etc.
>The task has a classification. See the task where you set general task.
>You should also see the CLASSIFICATION field.
>The DEFAULT classification (no class) is normally mapped to ALL in the
>t77tc,t77ro t77rp tables.
>
>Perhaps this isnt the case in your system.
>
>
>
>It is possible that due to NO classification or no active substitution
>you saw no result.
>
>
>The use of task classification is to set a task as say "LEAVE" category
>or 'TIME" related for say overtime or attendance approvals.
>
>Appraisal and other tasks relating to money or Infty 0008/0014/2010 etc
>could be linked to a class "MONEY"
>
>you then set a substitution in HR. such that (S) A210 --> (P2) is active
>for profile "L&T" and L&T is define as being LEAVE and TIME classes.
>
>A great way of delegating some but not all tasks (workflows)
>
>
>hth
>
>Phil Soady
>Senior Consultant
>Business Technologies
>SAP Australia
>* : 0412 213 079
>* : phil.soady at sap.com
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sandra Contreras [mailto:sccontreras at hotmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2003 3:48 AM
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: structural organization - relationships
>
>Hi Phil,
>
>Thanks for your help.  But yet I have the problem, I tested the
>relationship
>that you suggest and others but Wf can find the person or the user.
>
>Do you know if in HR, we most activated something??
>
>thanks again.
>
>
>Sandra Contreras
>WF Analyst.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Soady, Phil" <phil.soady at sap.com>
> >Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
> >To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> >Subject: Re: structural organization - relationships
> >Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:51:41 +0100
> >
> >Hi Sandra,
> >the best relationship to use is A210 Substitute. (S) A210-> (P2)
> >
> >The inbox of the position is visible to the holder
> >(there is none yet (P1) ) and their substitute (P2).
> >
> >You can also control which workflows by using task classification.
> >Ie LEAVE but not PAY workflows etc.
> >
> >Check the archives, this topic is familiar.
> >
> >Do the workflows do anything more than user decision ?
> >Then mention this to security people.
> >They may need to consider this new relationship so the extra auth can be
> >granted.
> >
> >Phil Soady
> >Senior Consultant
> >Business Technologies
> >SAP Australia
> >* : 0412 213 079
> >* : phil.soady at sap.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Sandra Contreras [mailto:sccontreras at hotmail.com]
> >Sent: Saturday, 18 January 2003 9:33 AM
> >To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> >Subject: structural organization - relationships
> >
> >Hi Everybody,
> >
> >We are implementing our workflows with the Human Resources Module  and
>just
> >one structural organization.  In some cases there are positions without
> >persons assigned,   I mean, we don t have any holder in these positions
> >yet,
> >but there are a temporally person that have these functions.  Anyone of
>you
> >knows what kind of relationship (  Successor,  Substitute, Application by
> >or
> >Substitute with profile) we have to use, with the objective that WF find
> >the
> >responsible for the tasks?
> >
> >We have the 4.6b release.  Thanks for your help.
> >
> >Sandra Contreras
> >WF Analyst
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >MSN Fotos: la forma mas facil de compartir e imprimir fotos.
> >http://photos.msn.es/support/worldwide.aspx
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Charla con tus amigos en lmnea mediante MSN Messenger:
>http://messenger.microsoft.com/es
 
 
_________________________________________________________________