No subject

Thu Jan 16 00:22:46 EST 2003

Thanks Richard. I recreated another Object and delegated it with super
type.It was a good but scary experience.
Swami Bala

>From: Richard Marut <rvmarut at earthlink.net>
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:10:56 -0800
>X-Originating-IP: 192.73.60.25
>Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.0.109]) by
>mc9-f19.bay6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 15 Jan
>2003 17:54:37 -0800
>Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com
>(LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id
><14.00894588 at cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:54:35 -0500
>Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
>1.8e)          with spool id 4441 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed, 15 Jan
>2003          20:54:16 -0500
>Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP at MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
>      V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 7113; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:53:45 -0500
>Received: from flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.232] by
>  mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via TCP with ESMTP ; Wed, 15
>    Jan 2003 20:53:44 EST
>Received: from kermit.psp.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.78.241]) by
>flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id
>18YyYa-0000Rn-00 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed, 15 Jan 2003
>17:10:56 -0800
>Received: (from nobody at localhost) by kermit.psp.pas.earthlink.net
>(8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) id h0G1AuB28169 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed,
>   15 Jan 2003 17:10:56 -0800 (PST)
>X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net
>Approved-By:  rvmarut at EARTHLINK.NET
>Message-ID:
><Springmail.0994.1042679456.0.06190100 at webmail.pas.earthlink.net>
>Sender:       SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>Precedence: list
>Return-Path: owner-sap-wug at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jan 2003 01:54:37.0254 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[39872E60:01C2BD02]
>
>Swami,
>
>Transporting back just the object entry is okay as long as you didn't add
>or
>remove methods since it's been in the test system. If you made these type
>of
>changes since it's been in test, I would also transport back the program
>entry. You could always download the development code before doing the
>transport so that you can re-create your new methods.
>
>I hope this answered your question.
>
>Richard Marut
>The Consulting Highway, Inc
>
>
>On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:33:24 -0800 Swami Bala <swam_in at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Richard for the tip. I just recreated
> > another object and delegated
> > it. But if I go for transport back from
> > testing, Is it just enough to
> > transport only the object type ?
> > Swami Bala
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: Richard Marut
> > >Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > >To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> > >Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:32:05 -0800
> > >X-Originating-IP: 192.73.60.25
> > >Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com
> > ([209.119.0.109]) by
> > >mc4-f27.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft
> > SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 15
> > >Jan 2003 15:35:38 -0800
> > >Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM
> > (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com
> > >(LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id
> > >; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:33:11 -0500
> > >Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by
> > MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
> > >1.8e)          with spool id 2537 for
> > SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed, 15 Jan
> > >2003          18:32:53 -0500
> > >Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP at MITVMA)
> > by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
> > >      V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 3957; Wed, 15
> > Jan 2003 18:32:01 -0500
> > >Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net
> > [207.217.120.122] by
> > >mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via TCP
> > with ESMTP ; Wed, 15
> > >  Jan 2003 18:32:00 EST
> > >Received: from bigbird.psp.pas.earthlink.net
> > ([207.217.78.244]) by
> > >pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp
> > (Exim 3.33 #1) id
> > >18Yx0w-00044A-00 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU;
> > Wed, 15 Jan 2003
> > >15:32:06 -0800
> > >Received: (from nobody at localhost) by
> > bigbird.psp.pas.earthlink.net
> > >(8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) id h0FNW5A29377 for
> > SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed,
> > >   15 Jan 2003 15:32:05 -0800 (PST)
> > >X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by
> > pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net
> > >Approved-By:  rvmarut at EARTHLINK.NET
> > >Message-ID:
> > >
> > >Sender:       SAP Workflow
> > >Precedence: list
> > >Return-Path: owner-sap-wug at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jan 2003
> > 23:35:39.0257 (UTC)
> > >FILETIME=[CFB1CE90:01C2BCEE]
> > >
> > >Swami,
> > >
> > >You shouldn't have a problem if you delete it
> > and re-create. The entry that
> > >goes into the request is R3TR SOBJ for the
> > business object and R3TR PROG
> > >for
> > >the program entry. The methods are not listed
> > so there should not be a
> > >problem. The end result should be that the
> > object will be overwritten in
> > >the
> > >test client. You may need to go there and
> > generate it manually.
> > >
> > >If it doesn't work, then delete the entire
> > object, then transport back from
> > >testing.
> > >
> > >Richard Marut
> > >The Consulting Highway, Inc
> > >
> > >
> > >On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:09:40 -0800 Swami Bala
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello All,
> > > > When I tried to change the Release status
> > of
> > > > the Object type from 'To
> > > > Implemented' to 'To Released'.I accidentely
> > > > clicked on the 'To Obsolete'.
> > > > First time I felt SAP was merciless. It
> > changed
> > > > the status
> > > > to 'Obsolete' with a message 'The object
> > cannot
> > > > be changed again'.I was
> > > > shocked and good thing is this this is in
> > > > development client. Does any body
> > > > have any suggestions on how do I bring it
> > back
> > > > to 'To released'
> > > > status ?. First of all I have transport
> > > > requests for this object and not
> > > > sure what would happen to them if I
> > transport
> > > > them. My collegue here
> > > > suggested me to delete it and then
> > transport it
> > > > back from Testing
> > > > client. Any implications ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > >
> > > > Swami
> > > >
> > > >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2
> > > > months FREE*
> > > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> > > >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2
> > months FREE*.
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup