Assigning multiple users to positions

[Swami Bala]

Hello Ralph,
 
I do have the same issue since we are moving towards common Org structure,.
Can you send me the power point as well ?
I really appreciate your helpl.
Thanks
 
Swami Bala
 
 
 
 
 
>From: Loren Huffman <LHuffman at sunsweet.com>
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: Assigning multiple users to positions
>Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:16:22 -0800
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.0.109]) by
>mc3-f6.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Fri, 10 Jan
>2003 10:19:30 -0800
>Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com
>(LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id
><12.0087485A at cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:19:26 -0500
>Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
>1.8e)          with spool id 3213 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 10 Jan
>2003          13:19:15 -0500
>Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP at MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
>      V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 9259; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:17:13 -0500
>Received: from mail.sunsweetgrowers.com [63.202.46.132] by mitvma.mit.edu
>(IBM          VM SMTP Level 320) via TCP with SMTP ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003
>13:17:12 EST
>Received: from ssycdo1-Message_Server by sunsweet.com with
>Novell_GroupWise;          Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:17:14 -0800
>X-Warning: mitvma.mit.edu: Host mail.sunsweetgrowers.com claimed to be
>      sunsweet.com
>X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
>Approved-By:  Loren Huffman <LHuffman at SUNSWEET.COM>
>Message-ID:  <se1e9daa.034 at sunsweet.com>
>Sender:       SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>Precedence: list
>Return-Path: owner-sap-wug at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2003 18:19:30.0604 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[D16E4EC0:01C2B8D4]
>
>Hi Ralph,
>
>Could you please send the power point file to me as well?
>
>Thanks
>Loren
>lhuffman at sunsweet.com
>
>
> >>> ralph.jensen at us.ibm.com 01/10/03 08:13AM >>>
>Fred,
>
>I have a drafted plan for implementing an Enterprise Organization Structure
>that you might want to review.  Should I sent it to you?  It's in MS Power
>Point.
>
>Regards,
>Ralph Jensen
>IBM Business Consulting Services
>Government Services Industry
>
>
>
>
>                       "Kouw, FA - SPLTC"
>                       <fa.kouw at td.klm.com        To:
>SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>                       >                          cc:
>                       Sent by: SAP               Subject:  Assigning
>multiple users to positions
>                       Workflow
>                       <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITV
>                       MA.MIT.EDU>
>
>
>                       01/10/2003 09:20 AM
>                       Please respond to
>                       "SAP Workflow
>                       Users' Group"
>
>
>
>
>
>Hello workflow colleagues,
>
>Can someone tell me what are the disadvantages of assigning multiple
>users to the same position, in order to achieve that all users assigned
>to the position recieve the same workitem? At the moment we only use the
>organizational plan for workflow purposes, can it be a problem if we
>will use it in the future for HR purposes?
>
>Should I assign one person to a position (in case of parttimers maybe
>more than one) and use jobs to achieve what I want?
>
>Regards,
>
>Fred Kouw
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged
>material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you
>are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed,
>copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
>attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
>received
>this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return
>e-mail,
>and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its
>subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
>incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible
>for any delay in receipt.
>**********************************************************************
>
>_____________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>This outbound message from KPN has been checked for all known viruses by
>KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs.
>For further information visit: http://www.veiliginternet.nl
>_____________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail