Binding errors in Prod client
Lola Oluwa
Lola.Oluwa at outokumpu.net
Mon Feb 24 10:05:02 EST 2003
...This could fix the binding issue, but you could be faced with another
problem; editing a development object in a client which does not own the
object. This means your new transport will end with error . Solution could
be to create a new copy of your WF definition in DEV make the right role
assignment and then transport this new def to QA and PROD as usual.
Regards,
||Lola Oluwa
||Integration Consultant
||(SAP Business Workflow, ABAP, TIBCO)
||
||Siemens Business Services
||eMail: lola.oluwa at siemens.com
||phone: +358 50 339 2128
Rick Sample
<Rick.Sample at gbe.co To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
m> cc: (bcc: Lola Oluwa/Outokumpuext)
Sent by: SAP Subject: Binding errors in Prod client
Workflow
<Owner-SAP-WUG at MITV
MA.MIT.EDU>
24.02.2003 16:33
Please respond to
"SAP Workflow
Users' Group"
I have a binding error in my production client that does not exist in Dev
or Q.
&TYPEID& not in Wf def but in Task def. Gives me a binding error when I do
a consistency check in Prod client.
I don't understand why the &TYPEID& in not in the WF container in the first
place. (?)
I know what I did wrong but need to know how to fix. This is what I did:
We had opened up the HQ0 box to do some changes to Roles do to the Number
Ranges generated
are different on the D, Q, and P clients. While I was in HQ0, I also
noticed this binding issue
and fixed in HQ0 without a transport. (Rookie mistake! Learned the errors
of my way!)
Reading of this list and the "Practical Workflows for SAP" if I Generate a
new version of the WF
which creates a new transport and transport to all, will this fix the
binding issues?
I have no binding errors in Dev or Q clients.
4.6C
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list