'Complete' status for Synchronous method

[Swami Bala]

Thanks Stefan, I sorted it out by having terminating events built in the
wflow with synchronous method.
 
Swami Bala
 
 
 
 
>why don't you throw a temporary exception in your synchronous method
>whenever the user cancels the dialog (e.g. using makro "exit_cancelled" )?
>This requires, that you know that the dialog has been  cancelled.
>After the temporary exception, the workitem will not be completed and can
>be executed again.
>
>regards, Stefan
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Pokraka [mailto:workflow at quirky.me.uk]
>Sent: Freitag, 14. Februar 2003 18:54
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: 'Complete' status for Synchronous method
>
>
>I seem to recall an argument I had some time back, when I was in
>security/network admin and certain directors didn't want the bother with
>passwords....
>Point is, there's only so much technology can do. Either it can let them
>verify their actions, or it can just proceed regardless. I assume the
>non-use of asynch methods is because they may sometimes not make any
>changes.
>I can kinda sympathize with your position, but sometimes you have to
>nudge people gently into the realms of logic and reality.
>
>
>On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 09:28:25AM -0800, Swami Bala wrote:
> > Sorry I didnot mention this before. We donot want to have this option
> > checked since it is one more screen for the Managers and Directors !!!.
> > I need to look at some other option of doing exactly the same logic but
> > without 'Confirm end of Processing'.
> > Thanks for your suggestions
> >
> > Swami Bala
> >
> > >Swami,
> > >Maybe what you need is the "Confirm End of Processing" to be checked.
>This
> > >will allow the user to execute the work item which will change status
>to
> > >executed but will not change to completed  until they select the
>complete
> > >option.  This does allow the work item to be executed several times
>though.
> > >Rgs,
> > >Susie
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >From:   Swami Bala [mailto:swam_in at hotmail.com]
> > >Sent:   Friday, February 14, 2003 10:54 AM
> > >To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> > >Subject:        'Complete' status for Synchronous method
> > >
> > >Hello All,
> > >
> > >I am confused at the 'Complete' status of the workItem when it is a
> > >synchronous method. I have a task with sync. method and this seems to
>work
> > >fine if the application is saved. But when the user just clicks the
>back
> > >arrow button without saving it, the work item goes into 'Complete'
>status
> > >and dissapears from Inbox. I donot want a asynch.method since i am
>passing
> > >parameters from the method back to wflow. How does defining a
>terminating
> > >event in synch. method works ?
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >Swami Bala
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_________________________________________________________________
> > >MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
> > >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
 
 
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail