Message to SAP-WUG

[Susan R. Keohan]

Thank you very much Phil.  I greatly appreciate the kind words.  Yes, I
try to keep the list clean, but it is the people who provide the real
answers (yourself!) who make this a good forum.
 
Anyhow, no skin off my nose.  I used the opportunity to apologize to
Heinrich as a reason to remind people what the rules of the road were!
 
Cheers,
Sue
 
Soady, Phil wrote:
 
>Susan,
>by all means apologise to Heinrich. But if not offence was intended, I see
>it as a genuine effort to look after the list.
>
>We all (I think) appreciate the fact that the list is clean.
>
>If you didn't look after the list we wouldn't have it.
>Or it wouldnt be as good as it is.
>
>The ONLY reason I continue to support it is due to the genuine nature
>of the posts.
>
>I think the participants and most of all yourself are to be congratulated for
>running a list server I have never seen so successful anywhere else.
>
>
>
>Phil Soady
>Senior Consultant
>Business Technologies
>SAP Australia
>* : 0412 213 079
>* : phil.soady at sap.com
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Susan R. Keohan [mailto:skeohan at mit.edu]
>Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 3:10 AM
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Message to SAP-WUG
>
>
>Good afternoon all,
>
>In my rush to respond rapidly to a question posed by Heinrich Bence, I was not as considerate or professional as I should have been.  Please excuse my abrupt reply.  I owe Heinrich an apology.
>
>As a brief refresher course, this list is not intended for solicatation or marketing purposes, but for the exchange of ideas and solutions related to SAP Workflow/Webflow development.  One way that other non-commerical lists deal with the possibility of unwanted messages getting through is to change the list to a 'moderated list'.  This means that each and every message to the list would have to be read and OK'ed by a moderator before the message could be distributed.  Since none of us (especially me) want this to happen, I need to react quickly to postings (however innocently posed) that may not be appropriate to this list.
>
>Again, I apoligize to Heinrich for my abrupt response.
>
>--
>Susan R. Keohan
>SAP Workflow Developer
>MIT Lincoln Laboratory
>244 Wood Street
>LI-200
>Lexington, MA. 02420
>781-981-3561
>skeohan at mit.edu
>
>
 
--
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Developer
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
skeohan at mit.edu