Role based on responsibilities

[Amit Levavi]

Hi Tomasz,
 
I'm trying to go alpng wioth your theory but one thing troubles me - my t=
ask IS defined as a general task but only those users who are linked insi=
de the role to one (or more) responsibilities get the work item. In addit=
ion, I've checked in the workflow log (is that the right place?) and the =
binding to the role looks OK. =20
 
Any other thought?
 
thanks for the help,
 
Amit
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Zmudzin,Tomasz,VEVEY,GL-DS/DM
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:44 PM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Role based on responsibilities
 
A dumb question: are you sure you pass the data to the role correctly? Wh=
at
I could see as one possibility is that:
 
- no data is passed,
- the agent determination procedure (=3Drole) finds no agent, fails silen=
tly
- workflow assumes all allowed agents, including all those specified in
responsibilities
- you've checked these who were assigned and all of them got the item
- (if your task were "general", so would all other users...)
 
It happened to me once :-)
Tomasz
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Amit Levavi [mailto:amitlevavi at hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday,14. November 2002 15:16
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Role based on responsibilities
 
 
Hi all,
 
I have a problem with roles based on responsibilities. It seems that
although the simulation for these roles works fine, on runtime the role
selects all the users related to any responsibility inside it as an agent
(i.e. it is as though all the responsibilities turn out valid altohugh th=
ey
are mutualy exclusive!).
 
Has anyone encountered such a problem? what can I do to find out the reas=
on?
is there any debugging i can do?
 
Please help,
 
Amit
 
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=3Dfeatures/featuredemailGet more from the Web. =
 FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com