Error WL 416

[Alon Raskin]

Is it possible that the Workflow definition has been corrupted? Has it recently
been transported? You may try to display it in SWDD in your production system,
how does it look? Perhaps (and this is a long shot) re-transporting the
Workflow and clearing the buffer may help.
 
Alon
 
Ps. You may also want to check OSS.
 
Quoting David Weston <weston at clockwork.ca>:
 
> Hi Ulrich...have you tried the alphanumeric editor rather then the
> graphical
> editor in SWDD ?
> Sometimes extra unused or redundant nodes may be displayed.
>
> Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ulrich Mende" <wug at mende-edv-beratung.de>
> To: <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 3:51 AM
> Subject: Error WL 416
>
>
> > Hi workflowers,
> > at this sweltering day here in Munich one of our workflows at
> production
> > system is running into an error WL 416 : "No successor '' (space)
> for
> > case node 400". Out of 200 workflows of the same task, same version
> 150
> > run well, the rest goes into error.
> >
> > What is mystery:
> > - our workflow definition has no node with number 400
> > - the workflow stops at the synchronization point ("endcase")
> >   of a case node 70, the case variable is always filled with a
> >   valid value
> >
> > I am afraid that the error message is misleading.
> >
> > Any suggestions? Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Uli Mende
> >
> >
> >
>
 
 
 
Alon Raskin
3i Consulting Group
http://www.3i-consulting.com