Person Reponsible feature
Martinek, Jerry
Jerry.Martinek at icbc.com
Thu Jan 24 12:01:34 EST 2002
Hi Kjetil, that's what I wanted to use but the problem is that the 'user'
option for the relationship definition is not available. We are currently
using 'positions' in the work center definition for our workflow
administrator but this isn't always accurate.
The problem we experienced with this technique is that if the people
assigned to those positions move within the organization, the work center is
no longer accurate. The maintenance of the work center definition tends to
get overlooked which in turn leads to lost notifications.
I know that the 'user' option isn't the best solution, but at this time, it
is more reliable than using 'position'.
Unless I can find a better solution, I'm going to get this user id added to
the required environment and get the workflow change transported to
production.
Thanks,
Jerry Martinek
-----Original Message-----
From: Kjetil Kilhavn [mailto:KJETILK at statoil.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:52 PM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Person Reponsible feature
<< File: Internet HTML >> << File: ATT589239.txt >> You can
create a work centre in development and transport it to production, then
populate it differently in development and production. Works
for me :-)
--
Kjetil Kilhavn
|--------+------------------------------>
| | "Martinek, Jerry" |
| | <Jerry.Martinek at icbc|
| | .com> |
| | Sent by: SAP |
| | Workflow |
| | <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVM|
| | A.MIT.EDU> |
| | |
| | |
| | 23.01.2002 18:20 |
| | Please respond to |
| | "SAP Workflow Users'|
| | Group" |
| | |
|--------+------------------------------>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
|
|
| To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
|
| cc: (bcc: Kjetil Kilhavn)
|
| Subject: Re: Person Reponsible feature
|
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
Hi Stephan and Michael and thank you for the advice.
The process you described works as long as the desired
'user' who will be
the responsible for the workflow in the PROD environment
exists in the
development environment where the actual workflow change is
being made. If
they don't, the field validation edit fails thus preventing
you from making
the change. It seems that in order for me to complete this
change, I need to
define this production user in our development environment.
Is this correct
or am I missing something?
Our development environment only contains the ids (usr01) of
the people who
can access that environment.
Also, how does the 'Person Responsible' function in the
'Additional Data'
sub menu of the base 'Workflow Template: Add' work?
Thanking In Advance,
Jerry Martinek
-----Original Message-----
From: michael.klika at de.pwcglobal.com
[mailto:michael.klika at de.pwcglobal.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:35 AM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Antwort: Person Reponsible
feature
hi jerry!
not quite sure what you did exactly. try the
following:
pftc_chg (in dev of course), open the
wf-builder, menue:
GOTO->BASIC DATA
now you find on tab RESPONSIB. a field for a
local sysadmin.
give the
desired name or better an organisational
unit, position or
role.
now: save, activate, test, transport
hope this helps,
michael
>Hi, I need some help with the 'Person
Responsible' feature.
My goal is to
override the workflow
> administrator definition for a custom
workflow and
redirect any problems
with this workflow to a different person.
>
>I made what I thought were the required
settings using the
'user' option
of the relationship definition.
> I ran a test but it didn't work, the
specified person
didn't receive any
notice about the workflow failure. I
> forced a role resolution problem in one of
the tasks
within the workflow.
>
>At this point I'm not sure if I don't
understand the usage
of the feature
or if it's the way I made the change.
>I used PFTC_DIS in PROD to make the desired
feature
setting. This sort of
seems strange that one
>is able to make the change using this
technique.
>
>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>We are currently on the latest 46c
functional and 46d basis
versions.
>
>Thanking in advance,
>Jerry Martinek
----------------------------------------------------------------
Diese Information ist ausschliesslich fuer
die adressierte
Person oder
Organisation bestimmt und koennte
vertrauliches und/oder
privilegiertes
Material enthalten. Personen oder
Organisationen, fuer die
diese
Information nicht bestimmt ist, ist es nicht
gestattet,
diese zu lesen,
erneut zu uebertragen, zu verbreiten,
anderweitig zu
verwenden oder sich
durch sie veranlasst zu sehen, Massnahmen
irgendeiner Art zu
ergreifen.
Sollten Sie diese Nachricht irrtuemlich
erhalten haben,
bitten wir Sie,
sich mit dem Absender in Verbindung zu
setzen und das
Material von Ihrem
Computer zu loeschen.
Sie haben uns gebeten, mit Ihnen ueber das
Internet per
E-Mail zu
korrespondieren. Unbeschadet dessen ist
allein die von uns
unterzeichnete
schriftliche Fassung verbindlich.
Wir weisen darauf hin, dass derartige
Nachrichten mit und
ohne Zutun von
Dritten verloren gehen, veraendert oder
verfaelscht werden
koennen.Herkoemmliche E-Mails sind nicht
gegen den Zugriff
von Dritten
geschuetzt und deshalb ist auch die
Vertraulichkeit unter
Umstaenden nicht
gewahrt Wir haften deshalb nicht fuer die
Unversehrtheit von
E-Mails
nachdem sie unseren Herrschaftsbereich
verlassen haben und
koennen Ihnen
hieraus entstehende Schaeden nicht ersetzen.
Sollte trotz
der von uns
verwendeten Virus-Schutz-Programmen durch
die Zusendung von
E-Mails ein
Virus in Ihre Systeme gelangen, haften wir
nicht fuer
eventuell hieraus
entstehende Schaeden. Dieser
Haftungsausschluss gilt nur
soweit gesetzlich
zulaessig.
English:
The information transmitted is intended only
for the person
or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or
privileged
material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or
other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this
information by
persons or
entities other than the intended recipient
is prohibited.If
you received
this in error, please contact the sender and
delete the
material from any
computer.
You have asked us to correspond with you via
the Internet
per e-mail.
However, the written version signed by us is
the only
authoritative
version. We draw your attention to the fact
that such
messages can be
lost, changed or falsified, with or without
any interference
by third
persons. Normal e-mails are not protected
against access by
third persons
and, therefore, their confidentiality may
not be assured in
certain
circumstances. We cannot be responsible for
the integrity of
emails after
they have left our sphere of control. We
shall not,
therefore, indemnify
you for any damages resulting out of these
circumstances.
If, despite our
use of anti-virus software, a virus enters
your systems in
connection with
the sending of the e-mail, you may not hold
us liable for
any damages that
may possibly arise in that connection. We
will accept
liability which by
law we cannot exclude.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20020124/3f66929b/attachment.htm
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list