AW: Suppressing workflow steps in workflow log

[Seiz, Gert]

Hy Sue,
which workflow-log do you mean ? The techincal or the *normal* workflow =
log.
=20
Deactivating the Log-Flag in an workflow step doesn't influence the
performance.=20
This will only avoid, that the step will be visible in the normol Log.
Nevertheless the step is visible in the techical-log.
=20
Regards Gert
=20
=20
-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Susan R. Keohan [mailto:skeohan at MIT.EDU]
Gesendet: Montag, 14. Januar 2002 18:40
An: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Betreff: Re: Suppressing workflow steps in workflow log
 
 
Hi Alon, =20
 
Thanks, but I did execute SWU_OBUF, and am in the same client, etc.  =
Still,
the steps I want suppressed are showing in the log.  Perplexing, =
nichts?
 
Cheerfully,
Sue
 
At 10:55 AM 1/14/02 -0600, you wrote:
 
 
Hi Susan,
 
Are you testing and making the change in the same client. If not then
execute transaction SWU_OBUF in the client that you are executing the
workflow and hit the REFRESH button. This will clear the workflow =
buffer and
force SAP to re-load the workflow definition. Alternatively, you can =
wait
till midnight until the buffer is automatically refreshed.
 
Alon Raskin
Workflow Advisor - Soliance
(xtn. 3183)
 
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Susan R. Keohan [ mailto:skeohan at MIT.EDU =
<mailto:skeohan at MIT.EDU> ]
Sent:   January 14 2002 10:47
To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject:        Suppressing workflow steps in workflow log
 
Hello Workflow gurus,
 
We are working on 4.6c. In a workflow definition which contains a task,
there is a switch in the step properties called 'Step not in Workflow =
Log'
(field name STEP_HIDE, structure SWD_SDYNP).  According to the F1 help, =
if
this is switched on, the step will not be displayed in the workflow =
log.  I
have set this switch to 'on' for a number of steps, and generated the
transaction which starts the 'new' version of the workflow, but I still =
see
these steps in the log file.   I am trying this out in an effort to cut
down on the size of the workflow logs and the system overhead.  Is =
there
something I am missing to implement this functionality ?  I've looked =
in
OSS to no avail...
 
Thanks!
Sue=20
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20020115/6ab54556/attachment.htm