Suppressing workflow steps in workflow log

[Susan R. Keohan]

Hi Alon,
 
Thanks, but I did execute SWU_OBUF, and am in the same client, etc.  Still,
the steps I want suppressed are showing in the log.  Perplexing, nichts?
 
Cheerfully,
Sue
 
At 10:55 AM 1/14/02 -0600, you wrote:
>Hi Susan,
>
>Are you testing and making the change in the same client. If not then
>execute transaction SWU_OBUF in the client that you are executing the
>workflow and hit the REFRESH button. This will clear the workflow buffer and
>force SAP to re-load the workflow definition. Alternatively, you can wait
>till midnight until the buffer is automatically refreshed.
>
>Alon Raskin
>Workflow Advisor - Soliance
>(xtn. 3183)
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>From:   Susan R. Keohan [mailto:skeohan at MIT.EDU]
>Sent:   January 14 2002 10:47
>To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject:        Suppressing workflow steps in workflow log
>
>Hello Workflow gurus,
>
>We are working on 4.6c. In a workflow definition which contains a task,
>there is a switch in the step properties called 'Step not in Workflow Log'
>(field name STEP_HIDE, structure SWD_SDYNP).  According to the F1 help, if
>this is switched on, the step will not be displayed in the workflow log.  I
>have set this switch to 'on' for a number of steps, and generated the
>transaction which starts the 'new' version of the workflow, but I still see
>these steps in the log file.   I am trying this out in an effort to cut
>down on the size of the workflow logs and the system overhead.  Is there
>something I am missing to implement this functionality ?  I've looked in
>OSS to no avail...
>
>Thanks!
>Sue
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20020114/1bff6f77/attachment.htm