<html>
<font size=3>Hi Alon, <br>
<br>
Thanks, but I did execute SWU_OBUF, and am in the same client, etc.
Still, the steps I want suppressed are showing in the log.
Perplexing, nichts?<br>
<br>
Cheerfully,<br>
Sue<br>
<br>
At 10:55 AM 1/14/02 -0600, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Hi Susan,<br>
<br>
Are you testing and making the change in the same client. If not
then<br>
execute transaction SWU_OBUF in the client that you are executing
the<br>
workflow and hit the REFRESH button. This will clear the workflow buffer
and<br>
force SAP to re-load the workflow definition. Alternatively, you can
wait<br>
till midnight until the buffer is automatically refreshed.<br>
<br>
Alon Raskin<br>
Workflow Advisor - Soliance<br>
(xtn. 3183)<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Susan R. Keohan
[<a href="mailto:skeohan@MIT.EDU" eudora="autourl">mailto:skeohan@MIT.EDU</a>]<br>
Sent: January 14 2002 10:47<br>
To: SAP-WUG@MITVMA.MIT.EDU<br>
Subject: Suppressing workflow
steps in workflow log<br>
<br>
Hello Workflow gurus,<br>
<br>
We are working on 4.6c. In a workflow definition which contains a
task,<br>
there is a switch in the step properties called 'Step not in Workflow
Log'<br>
(field name STEP_HIDE, structure SWD_SDYNP). According to the F1
help, if<br>
this is switched on, the step will not be displayed in the workflow
log. I<br>
have set this switch to 'on' for a number of steps, and generated
the<br>
transaction which starts the 'new' version of the workflow, but I still
see<br>
these steps in the log file. I am trying this out in an
effort to cut<br>
down on the size of the workflow logs and the system overhead. Is
there<br>
something I am missing to implement this functionality ? I've
looked in<br>
OSS to no avail...<br>
<br>
Thanks!<br>
Sue </font></blockquote></html>