Check function results?

[Van Heerde, Arnoud]

Hi Thomas,
=20
Would like to share with other people on the list if you don't mind. =
This is
the entry I created in the type linkage table in a 40B system.
=20
Object type          <OBJECT-TYPE>
Event                CHANGED
Receiver type        <USER-NAME>
Receiver FM          SWE_EVENT_MAIL
Check function
Receiver type FM
Destination
=20
Maybe you could compare it with your settings.
=20
Hope this helps,
=20
Arnoud
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Nieder Martin [mailto:Martin.Nieder at munich-airport.de]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:41 PM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: AW: Check function results?
=20
Hello Kate,
=20
I solved this problem by defining a Z-table and let the check-function
module insert in this table. So I can find out, why workflows didn't =
start.
=20
Martin
-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Ikeda, Kate Poplin [mailto:kpikeda at ti.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2001 17:39
An: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Betreff: Check function results?
We have a 4.0B custom workflow triggered by an SAP event that has a =
check
function out front.  In the check function we raise one of 10 =
exceptions
depending on what went wrong.  When troubleshooting a problem I can see =
in
the event log that the check function ended with an exception.  Is =
there any
way to tell which of the 10 exceptions caused the check function to =
fail?
Thanks,=20
Best regards,=20
Kate Poplin Ikeda=20
Accenture=20
972/927-6156
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20011023/f050aa0e/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: unknown sender
Subject: no subject
Date: no date
Size: 7833
Url: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20011023/f050aa0e/attachment.eml