Confused deadline reactions

Dr. Ulrich Mende wug at mende-edv-beratung.de
Tue Jun 5 15:58:43 EDT 2001


Hi, Stefan -
thanks very much. I had a look at note 397576. It describes an error WL410
occuring after deadline was reached.
We did not get such errors, but nevertheless I will apply it.
Best regars  Uli
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Baeuerle, Stefan <stefan.baeuerle at sap.com>
To: <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: Confused deadline reactions
 
 
> Hi Susan, hi Ulrich,
>
> take a look at note 397576. This note should solve your problem.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Stefan
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From:   Susan R. Keohan [mailto:skeohan at MIT.EDU]
> Sent:   Montag, 4. Juni 2001 15:08
> To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject:        Fwd: Confused deadline reactions
>
> On behalf of Ulrich Mende (info at MENDE-EDV-BERATUNG.DE)...
> >Hello workflowers,
> >in a productive system 4.5B we have a problem with deadline monitoring of
> >workflows. For an approval step we use both: Lates Starting Date ( LSD)
> >deadline and Latest Ending Date (LED) deadline as well.
> >Modelled reactions:
> >After LSD:  send a reminder mail to the approver (offset = 4 days)
> >After LED:  forward to the director (= boss of the approver) (offset = 9
> >days)
> >We have about 1000 workflows per day and over a period of one year
> >everything worked fine.
> >
> >Now the system was down for 5 days. After the restart hundreds of
workitems
> >were forwarded, what is easy to explain: batch report RSWWDHEX was not
> >running the last 5 days too.
> >But, evidently, report RSWWDHEX now confuses LSD and LED in some (not in
> >all)
> >cases. It forwards workitems which have just reached the LSD, skipping
the
> >reminder mail, while LED is stiil 3 days ahead. The  concerned director
is
> >not amused by his overflowing inbox...
> >The calculation of LSD and LED  is correct, as shown by the workitem
> >details.
> >So I suspect that SWWDHEX under stress behaves not normally...
> >
> >Has anyone of you already faced this problem?
> >
> >Best regards  and thanks  Uli
> >
 


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list