Fwd: RE: workflow transport problems and OSS note 378487

[Susan R. Keohan]

On behalf of john.soden at NORMANDY.COM.AU...
 
>Disclaimer: The information contained in this email is intended only for the
>use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or
>contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended
>recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution,
>copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>email in error please immediately advise us by return email at
>postmaster at normandy.com.au and delete the email document without making a
>copy.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------------
>hi Jocelyn
>
>thanks for the reply - I will post to OSS as advised
>
>John...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dart, Jocelyn [mailto:jocelyn.dart at sap.com]
>Sent: Friday, 27 April 2001 12:41 pm
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: workflow transport problems and OSS note 378487
>
>
>Hi, Soden?
>Please put it into OSS if you haven't already.
>Regards,
>        Jocelyn Dart
>Consultant (BBP, Ecommerce, Internet Transaction Server, Workflow)
>SAP Australia
>Email jocelyn.dart at sap.com <mailto:jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
>Tel: +61 412 390 267
>Fax: +61 2 9935 4880
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: soden at picknowl.com.au [mailto:soden at picknowl.com.au]
>Sent: Thursday, 26 April 2001 2:19 PM
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: workflow transport problems and OSS note 378487
>
>
>hi all
>
>we are running 46C - SP 16 and are experiencing similar transport
>problems described in the message thread 'workflow transport
>problems' ie...
>
>the initial transport of a new workflow template from development to
>our QA system is fine, the workflow version 0000 arrives in the
>destination system in an activated state.
>
>I then make changes to that workflow in development which syntax
>check and activate without a problem.
>
>When this change is transported to QA the a new version 0001 is
>created and is flagged as the active version when versions are viewed
>through 'Workflow > Other workflow/version' option in the workflow
>builder, however this version has the status '[Revised,Saved]' when
>veiwing in the workflow builder. If you switch to version 0000 its
>status is [Active,Saved] and appears to be the workflow that is
>triggered.
>
>I have tried creating a new version in development and transporting
>that with the same result (in QA 0002 is flagged as active in 'Other
>workflow/version' but 0000 is still the [Active,Saved] version.
>
>There don't appear to be any problems flagged in transport or import
>generation logs
>
>NB. OSS note 378487 has been applied through SP 16
>
>any ideas?
>