Background processing of MR1M

[Winfried Winterstein]

Hello Martin,
 
have you already checked if the transaction behaves
the same way in the background?
If you run transactions in the background the sequence
of screens could be different or additional screen
scould pop-up (e.g. like in FB01 the allocation block
comes up automatically per line item when you run the
TXN as a batch input session).
As a test, that usually works fine, you can start the
batch input recorder (TXN: SHDB) with MR1M and check
if the TXN still looks the same way.
 
Good luck,
Winfried Winterstein (CSC PLOENZKE)
--- Martin Maguth <martin.maguth at ixos.com> schrieb: >
all:
>
> we have a "problem" here in a project. we are trying
> to process transaction
> MR1M as batchinput session in a background task.
>
> everything works fine when we test the underlying
> method and the workflow
> runs without problems when we make the corresponding
> task dialog. however,
> as soon as we set the task to background and run the
> workflow, the posting
> fails and returns a sy-subrc of 1.
>
> also, i have already checked:
>
> (1) authorization of user WF-BATCH -> ok
> (2) bindings in wf -> ok (shouldn't matter though bc
> it works in dialog)
> (3) set method up in program and run as scheduled
> job in background -> ok
>
> any ideas ?! it has some urgency ...
>
> thx,
>
> martin
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
>
> Martin Maguth
> Manager - Business Workflow Consulting
> IXOS Software Inc.
>
> Ohio Office:
> Pennsylvania Office:
> 588 Shelbourne Lane, Suite 206
> 19 Campus Blvd., Suite
> 100
> Centerville, OH 45458
>      Newtown Square, PA
> 19073
> Tel.: ++ (937) 432-0265
>              Tel.: ++
> (610) 355-7467
> Email: martin.maguth at ixos.com
 
 
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/