[mosh-devel] Thanks !

[Dave Taht]

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Keith Winstein <keithw at mit.edu> wrote:
> Thanks guys, looks great and thank you for carefully reproducing the
> results. I do agree that probably you might need a longer trace to map
> the tails of the delay distribution more precisely, although would be
> helpful to see the histogram to know what's goin gon.

I love the reproducing network research projects' efforts.

Since we're in the middle of changing a rather major variable in how
networks work with advanced aqm's like sfq codel and fq_codel, I
foresee a need to revisit much more network research in the future.

I would certainly like to see a test of mosh vs ssh while the network
was stressed out under one of rrul tests, for example, under drop tail
and the new aqms.

Does mininet have anything resembling a wifi emulation mode?
> We'll be happy to link to you from the Mosh homepage.
>
> Best regards,
> Keith
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Kanthi Nagaraj <kanthicn at stanford.edu> wrote:
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> It was great playing around with Mosh. We think it's a clever, useful tool.
>> Also a personal thanks for helping us use Mininet to reproduce your
>> results.
>>
>> We'd love your feedback on our project:
>> http://reproducingnetworkresearch.wordpress.com/2013/03/14/mosh-cs244-13/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Emily , Kanthi
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mosh-devel mailing list
> mosh-devel at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-devel



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html