[LCM Articles] Not so smart when it comes to the Middle East

[Abdallah Jabbour]

By Lou Dobbs <http://www.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/dobbs.lou.html>
CNN
Tuesday, July 25, 2006; Posted: 6:04 p.m. EDT (22:04 GMT)


*NEW YORK (CNN) -- We Americans like to think we're a pretty smart people,
even when evidence to the contrary is overwhelming. And nowhere is that
evidence more overwhelming than in the Middle East. History in the Middle
East is everything, and we Americans seem to learn nothing from it.*

President Harry Truman took about 20 minutes to recognize the state of
Israel when it declared independence in 1948. Since then, more than 58 years
of war, terrorism and blood-letting have led to the events of the past week.

Even now, as Katyusha rockets rain down on northern Israel and Israeli
fighter jets blast Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon, we simultaneously
decry radical Islamist terrorism and Israel's lack of restraint in defending
itself.

And the U.S. government, which wants no part of a cease-fire until Israel is
given every opportunity to rescue its kidnapped soldiers and destroy as many
Hezbollah and Hezbollah armaments as possible, urges caution in the interest
of preserving a nascent and fragile democratic government in Lebanon. Could
we be more conflicted?

While the United States provides about $2.5 billion in military and economic
aid to Israel each year, U.S. aid to Lebanon amounts to no more than $40
million. This despite the fact that the per capita GDP of Israel is among
the highest in the world at $24,600, nearly four times as high as Lebanon's
GDP per capita of $6,200.

Lebanon's lack of wealth is matched by the Palestinians -- three out of
every four Palestinians live below the poverty line. Yet the vast majority
of our giving in the region flows to Israel. This kind of geopolitical
inconsistency and shortsightedness has contributed to the Arab-Israeli
conflict that the Western world seems content to allow to perpetuate
endlessly.

After a week of escalating violence, around two dozen Israelis and roughly
200 Lebanese have died. That has been sufficient bloodshed for United
Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan and British Prime Minister Tony Blair
to join in the call for an international security force, ignoring the fact
that a U.N. force is already in Southern Lebanon, having failed to secure
the border against Hezbollah's incursions and attacks and the murder and
kidnapping of Israeli soldiers.

As our airwaves fill with images and sounds of exploding Hezbollah rockets
and Israeli bombs, this seven-day conflict has completely displaced from our
view another war in which 10 Americans and more than 300 Iraqis have died
during the same week. And it is a conflict now of more than three years
duration that has claimed almost 15,000 lives so far this year alone.

An estimated 50,000 Iraqis and more than 2,500 American troops have been
killed since the insurgency began in March of 2003, which by some estimates
is more than the number of dead on both sides of the Arab-Israeli conflict
over the past 58 years of wars and intifadas.

Yet we have seen no rescue ships moving up the Euphrates for Iraqis who are
dying in their streets, markets and mosques each day. French Prime Minister
Dominique de Villepin has not leaped to Baghdad as he did Beirut. And there
are no meetings of the Arab League, and no U.S. diplomacy with Egypt, Syria
and Jordan directed at ending the Iraqi conflict.

In the Middle East, where is our sense of proportion? Where is our sense of
perspective? Where is our sense of decency? And, finally, just how smart are
we?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/lebanon-articles/attachments/20060725/c7aa603a/attachment.htm