KDC Audit project

Dmitri Pal dpal at redhat.com
Tue Jan 8 19:39:15 EST 2013

On 01/08/2013 06:45 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation, I now have a better understanding of why you 
> prefer the more generic interface.
> I won't have time to reflect on the matter for a while, though.
> I don't think our previous discussions considered the possibility of 
> needing to add a new piece of data to an existing trace point, though that 
> does seem like a rare operation from the current point of view.
> The CEE initiative pointer is also helpful; we didn't attempt to survey 
> even logging systems in our previous discussions.  It did seem like the 
> trend in libaudit consumers was towards defining lots of different audit 
> routines, though.

Yes and this was evaluated later and agreed that it was kind of a
mistake and a wrong approach.

> -Ben
> _______________________________________________
> krbdev mailing list             krbdev at mit.edu
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev

Thank you,
Dmitri Pal

Sr. Engineering Manager for IdM portfolio
Red Hat Inc.

Looking to carve out IT costs?

More information about the krbdev mailing list