: Why are we using libverto again

Nathaniel McCallum npmccallum at redhat.com
Thu Jul 7 12:52:40 EDT 2011

On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 11:35 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> Simo, I agree with everything you said, with one correction below...
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 11:26 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Windows was not stated as a necessary dependency when the project was
> > started. If it is now I am sure we can add it on the roadmap. The only
> > issue is that I know of no event libraries available in Windows at all
> > unless you count stuff that compiles on cygwyn/mingw which you said is
> > not ok.
> glib is available on win32 and libverto will be available shortly via
> mingw32. I am taking careful attention to make sure that this will
> compile in MSVC++ as well (though as I don't have MSVC++ right now I
> can't guarantee it of course).
> Nathaniel

I've committed a win32 port. It is untested but compiles. That being
said, most of the code is from my previous experience with LoadLibrary()
on win32, so it should mostly work.


More information about the krbdev mailing list