Preliminary discussion: DB alias entries
ssorce at redhat.com
Thu Mar 5 13:59:34 EST 2009
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:42 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Simo" == Simo Sorce <ssorce at redhat.com> writes:
> Simo> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 12:27 -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
> >> Sam proposes separating the alias database from the principal
> >> database to facilitate integration.
> >> If we go that route for DB2--say, using a second DB2 database
> >> for aliases--how do people think LDAP aliases should be
> >> handled? Perhaps a separate container DN for aliases?
> Simo> No please, separate interfaces does not mean you have to
> Simo> have separate objects, you rather want to keep all
> Simo> information in one object so that it is consistent.
> I think for db2 separate interfaces basically does mean separate
I guess it depends on how the backend is implemented.
I agree that for db2 it might be the case,
but for LDAP it does not have to.
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
More information about the krbdev