Preliminary discussion: DB alias entries

[Sam Hartman]

>>>>> "Simo" == Simo Sorce <ssorce at redhat.com> writes:

    Simo> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 12:27 -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
    >> Sam proposes separating the alias database from the principal
    >> database to facilitate integration.
    >> 
    >> If we go that route for DB2--say, using a second DB2 database
    >> for aliases--how do people think LDAP aliases should be
    >> handled?  Perhaps a separate container DN for aliases?

    Simo> No please, separate interfaces does not mean you have to
    Simo> have separate objects, you rather want to keep all
    Simo> information in one object so that it is consistent.

I think for db2 separate interfaces basically does mean separate
objects.