appl/{bsd,ftp,telnet} unbundling plan

Mike Patnode mike.patnode at
Wed Jun 3 13:48:06 EDT 2009

We have both a PAM & LAM implementation we'd be willing to submit.
We're just finishing the 1.7 integration now and from there just need to
find time to submit the changes back.


-----Original Message-----
From: krbdev-bounces at [mailto:krbdev-bounces at] On Behalf
Of Russ Allbery
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:40 AM
To: krbdev at
Subject: Re: appl/{bsd,ftp,telnet} unbundling plan

ghudson at MIT.EDU writes:

> Russ Allbery has volunteered to put a minimal amount of time into
> maintaining appl/bsd.  Ken Hornstein has indicated an interest in
> telnet and FTP, although I'm not sure how much of a time commitment.
> Both already have MIT accounts and thus can be given access to our
> infrastructure.  It doesn't appear that anyone is interested in
> putting in the time to be a primary maintainer of any of the three
> pieces of code (e.g. adding new features, improving its portability by
> using PAM instead of login.krb5, etc.).  My sense is that we (MIT) are
> willing to put in some one-time effort to get the code out of our main
> tree, but are not interested in raising our long-term commitment level
> to it beyond "the minimum necessary".

I may be able to find some time to work on the PAM support, or find a
different solution to that problem at least for Kerberos rlogin and rsh.

The plan sounds good to me.

Russ Allbery (rra at
krbdev mailing list             krbdev at

More information about the krbdev mailing list