appl/{bsd,ftp,telnet} unbundling plan
Mike Patnode
mike.patnode at centrify.com
Wed Jun 3 13:48:06 EDT 2009
We have both a PAM & LAM implementation we'd be willing to submit.
We're just finishing the 1.7 integration now and from there just need to
find time to submit the changes back.
mp
-----Original Message-----
From: krbdev-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:krbdev-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Russ Allbery
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:40 AM
To: krbdev at mit.edu
Subject: Re: appl/{bsd,ftp,telnet} unbundling plan
ghudson at MIT.EDU writes:
> Russ Allbery has volunteered to put a minimal amount of time into
> maintaining appl/bsd. Ken Hornstein has indicated an interest in
> telnet and FTP, although I'm not sure how much of a time commitment.
> Both already have MIT accounts and thus can be given access to our
> infrastructure. It doesn't appear that anyone is interested in
> putting in the time to be a primary maintainer of any of the three
> pieces of code (e.g. adding new features, improving its portability by
> using PAM instead of login.krb5, etc.). My sense is that we (MIT) are
> willing to put in some one-time effort to get the code out of our main
> tree, but are not interested in raising our long-term commitment level
> to it beyond "the minimum necessary".
I may be able to find some time to work on the PAM support, or find a
different solution to that problem at least for Kerberos rlogin and rsh.
The plan sounds good to me.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)
<http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev at mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
More information about the krbdev
mailing list