Unit tests of internal functions

[Luke Howard]

On 30/12/2009, at 3:23 PM, Luke Howard wrote:

> 
> On 30/12/2009, at 3:09 PM, Ezra Peisach wrote:
> 
>> Ignoring the bashing of libtool...
>> 
>> There is another solution to the problem and requires the export of only 
>> one function... It is however ugly... One could build the test programs 
>> into the library requiring a single function to execute them....  For a 
>> static library this would not be so bad as the test code would be thrown 
>> out at linking.  With shared libraries, all executables get the code as 
>> well...
> 
> But maybe combined with the idea of linking the shared library twice (with and without tests), this is workable?

Or always build it static for testing, and dynamic/static otherwise for install.

-- Luke