Unit tests of internal functions

[Luke Howard]

On 30/12/2009, at 3:09 PM, Ezra Peisach wrote:

> Ignoring the bashing of libtool...
> 
> There is another solution to the problem and requires the export of only 
> one function... It is however ugly... One could build the test programs 
> into the library requiring a single function to execute them....  For a 
> static library this would not be so bad as the test code would be thrown 
> out at linking.  With shared libraries, all executables get the code as 
> well...

But maybe combined with the idea of linking the shared library twice (with and without tests), this is workable?

-- Luke