Services4User review

[Luke Howard]

> * The eventual fate of that code is a bit unclear unclear.  Will  
> didn't
> think there were any particular plans for a merge in one direction or
> the other, but I'm still concerned that we might want to retain merge
> compatibility if only for the sake of shuttling patches back and  
> forth.
> (For instance, I think I may have discovered a memory leak in the
> mechglue gss_accept_context, which Sun might be interested to know
> about.)

Also, as mentioned in my earlier mail, I think we should merge in  
Sun's changes, to fix the fix for handling of delegated credentials.

-- Luke