RRC and sign_only
Love Hörnquist Åstrand
lha at kth.se
Wed Dec 17 11:39:44 EST 2008
17 dec 2008 kl. 07:47 skrev Greg Hudson:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 08:13 +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>> I think it don't make sense to have different semantics depending on
>> which api an application uses. And we should allow every per RFC
>> request with any api.
> If you are using the IOV API in non-stream mode, you are not really
> using the RFC wire format; you're using an extension. It's reasonable
> for this extension to have restrictions not imposed by the RFC.
I beg to differ.
> Put another way, it makes sense to have different semantics
> depending on
> which API an application uses *if* the different API usages are for
> different network protocols.
Only SIGN_ONLY make it non RFC.
More information about the krbdev