RRC and sign_only

[Love Hörnquist Åstrand]

17 dec 2008 kl. 07:47 skrev Greg Hudson:

> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 08:13 +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>> I think it don't make sense to have different semantics depending on
>> which api an application uses. And we should allow every per RFC  
>> valid
>> request with any api.
>
> If you are using the IOV API in non-stream mode, you are not really
> using the RFC wire format; you're using an extension.  It's reasonable
> for this extension to have restrictions not imposed by the RFC.

I beg to differ.

> Put another way, it makes sense to have different semantics  
> depending on
> which API an application uses *if* the different API usages are for
> different network protocols.

Only SIGN_ONLY make it non RFC.

Love