need project review
jaltman at secure-endpoints.com
Mon Apr 7 10:26:24 EDT 2008
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> That's OK, but as was said before it's hard to get approval for a
> change if there isn't a tested rollback procedure. A bit if
> documented thought about how to do that would be a good thing, even if
> it's "restore from a backup". This change seems low risk and likely
> to fail quickly if it does fail.
This specific change might not but what if there is some other change
made as part of 1.7 which doesn't reveal itself for several weeks after
you go into production requires a rollback?
The lack of a rollback procedure is an impediment to adoption of
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3355 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krbdev/attachments/20080407/8223a34f/attachment.bin
More information about the krbdev