need project review

[Jeffrey Altman]

Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> 
> That's OK, but as was said before it's hard to get approval for a  
> change if there isn't a tested rollback procedure.  A bit if  
> documented thought about how to do that would be a good thing, even if  
> it's "restore from a backup".  This change seems low risk and likely  
> to fail quickly if it does fail.

This specific change might not but what if there is some other change 
made as part of 1.7 which doesn't reveal itself for several weeks after
you go into production requires a rollback?

The lack of a rollback procedure is an impediment to adoption of
new releases.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3355 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krbdev/attachments/20080407/8223a34f/attachment.bin