Principal to directory object mapping

[Sam Hartman]

>>>>> "S" == S Rahul <srahul at novell.com> writes:

    S> Hi, When I wrote 'association', I was not referring to any
    S> particular way of associating principals to directory objects
    S> (links, containment or auxiliary class). I just wanted to
    S> propose a way to do the mapping in the background. When I said
    S> "principal is associated with object", I actually meant
    S> "principal is *mapped* to object". A way to implement it in the
    S> directory has been proposed by Praveen in his mail (Sub:
    S> Associating Kerberos identities to LDAP object).

Understood.

However from my standpoint the cases where one form of mapping is
appropriate seem different than cases where other forms of mapping are
appropriate.

Am I the only one who is looking at things this way?

--Sam