Novell and MIT moving forward on LDAP Plugin
Savitha R
rsavitha at novell.com
Tue Jul 25 07:07:28 EDT 2006
>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 2:40 AM, in message
<20060724211051.GA28516 at sun.com>,
Will Fiveash <William.Fiveash at sun.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:23:41AM - 0600, Savitha R wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Following is the list of issues that Novell will be working on
>>
>> 1. Schema changes.
>>
>> 2. Support for ldapi://
>> The LDAP server needs to be specified as LDAP URI in krb5.conf
>> (ldap_server tag)
>
> Does this work include support for more flexible LDAP bind
specification
> via the URI and a way to specify the SASL security mech. to use?
>
What we are looking at initially is to specify the LDAP server via
an LDAP URI. E.g.
"ldap[s]://[servername[:port]]"
or in case of LDAP over IPC :
"ldapi:///<path to the unix domain socket>/"
We will be considering the support for SASL mechanisms later
>> 3. The code for princtype differentiation based on objectclass will
be
>> removed
>>
>> 4. Single principal on the LDAP object with subsequent
>> principal objects linked to the LDAP object.
>>
>> 5. Principal to LDAP object mapping based on some rules
>> without mandating - x userdn option.
>>
>> 6. Replace the LDAP APIs which are deprecated in OpenLDAP 2.3
>>
>> We will be posting more information on 1, 4 and 5 separately.
>
> Any idea when you plan on posting this information?
Information on 4 and 5 will be posted today or tomorrow.
The schema changes will be posted by the end of this week.
> I was speaking with
> Sam recently on how we can move forward and Sun would like to
contribute
> fixes/enhancements to the Novell LDAP plugin code but we do not want
to
> duplicate effort or work at cross purposes.
>
> BTW, did you see the list of Sun LDAP plugin requirements? Any
comments
> on that (if you do have some it would be better to respond on that
other
> e- mail thread)?
We have seen the list of requirements. We will respond with our
comments.
Regards
Savitha
More information about the krbdev
mailing list