MSFT KDC renew behaviour
Jeffrey Hutzelman
jhutz at cmu.edu
Mon Jan 9 19:05:16 EST 2006
On Monday, January 09, 2006 09:11:19 AM -0800 Paul Moore
<paul.moore at centrify.com> wrote:
> I was assuming that this list was the repository of the correct
> interpretation of RFC1510. Can you please direct me to which list is
That would be the IETF Kerberos Working Group mailing list,
ietf-krb-wg at anl.gov. While your question about interpretation of the spec
is no-topic there, discussion as to whether any particular implementation
is compliant are generally not; if you come to the conclusion that the
Windows KDC is buggy, your best course of action is to file a bug with
Microsoft.
Also, you should note that RFC1510 contains a number of errors and
vaguenesses which makes it not always the best reference for correct
behavior. A better source is the updated specification in RFC4120.
-- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <jhutz+ at cmu.edu>
Sr. Research Systems Programmer
School of Computer Science - Research Computing Facility
Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA
More information about the krbdev
mailing list