Doing away with changelogs
hartmans at MIT.EDU
Sat Apr 8 12:52:23 EDT 2006
>>>>> "Will" == Will Fiveash <William.Fiveash at sun.com> writes:
Will> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:29:28PM -0500, Nicolas Williams
>> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 04:13:02PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: >
>> I'd like to seek comments on this proposal.
>> Specifically, make sure that commits include references to rt
>> tickets and a synopsis and let Subversion do the rest.
Will> Yes, a way of reliably mapping a bug/rt ID to a change set
Will> and vice versa is good. Enabling that in an automated
Will> fashion, even better. In the past I used a source control
Will> system that required a bug ID in order to check-in new code.
Will> Thus the mapping was auto-enforced.
We're not proposing changing our policy and requiring a ticket for all
commits at this time. It probably would be fairly easy to add links
from RT to revisions. The other direction would be a bit harder and
exposing it in the UI even harder.
More information about the krbdev