default_tkt_enctypes and default_tgs_enctypes linkage?

[Henry B. Hotz]

Those of us with ambitions of being implementation-neutral appreciate  
the consideration.

On Sep 9, 2005, at 9:07 AM, krbdev-request at mit.edu wrote:

> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:23:04 -0400
> From: Sam Hartman <hartmans at MIT.EDU>
> To: MIT Kerberos Dev List <krbdev at MIT.EDU>
> Subject: Re: default_tkt_enctypes and default_tgs_enctypes linkage?
> Message-ID: <tsl1x3zjdhz.fsf at cz.mit.edu>
> In-Reply-To: <20050908233226.GA19751 at sun.com> (Will Fiveash's message  
> of
>  "Thu, 8 Sep 2005 18:32:26 -0500")
> References: <20050829215918.GA7665 at sun.com>  
> <20050830181658.GC8348 at sun.com>
> 	<tslek7znyai.fsf at cz.mit.edu> <20050908233226.GA19751 at sun.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Precedence: list
> Message: 1
>
> I was sort of thinking of default_enctypes or default_etypes.  I
> wanted to use the same option Heimdal uses for this purpose unless
> there is a good reason not to.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> krbdev mailing list
> krbdev at mit.edu
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
>
>
> End of krbdev Digest, Vol 33, Issue 8
> *************************************
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz at jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz at oxy.edu