ac_check_krb5 - comments requested

[Henry B. Hotz]

On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:07 AM, krbdev-request at mit.edu wrote:

> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 07:37:49 -0400
> From: Buck Huppmann <buckh at pobox.com>
> To: Tom Yu <tlyu at MIT.EDU>
> Cc: krbdev at mit.edu
> Subject: Re: ac_check_krb5 - comments requested
> Message-ID:  
> <20051027113749.GA19415 at dsl092-173-085.wdc2.dsl.speakeasy.net>
> In-Reply-To: <ldvk6g7er0p.fsf at cathode-dark-space.mit.edu>
> References: <ldvk6g7er0p.fsf at cathode-dark-space.mit.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Precedence: list
> Message: 1
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 06:56:54PM -0400, Tom Yu wrote:
>
>> (2) What should be done about runpaths?  (In MIT krb5, they are
>>     currently emitted if the build system linked the krb5 binaries
>>     with runpaths.)  Note that actually altering current behavior
>>     might break some things, and requires altering krb5-config's
>>     behavior in any case.
>>
>> (3) Related to (2), what should be done about differences between
>>     compilers on the same platform?
>
> my apologies if this wrankles anybody's religious sensibilities, but
> can you punt and tell consumers to use libtool?

Does libtool address (3)?
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz at jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz at oxy.edu