request: provide a canonical autoconf fragment for finding krb5 and/or gssapi

[Sam Hartman]

>>>>> "Love" == Love  <lha at stacken.kth.se> writes:

    Love> Sam Hartman <hartmans at mit.edu> writes:

    >> I propose we treat both Derrick and Love's requests as 1.4.1
    >> issues on the MIT side provided that we don't end up blocking
    >> on any Heimdal coordination issues.
    >> 
    >> I don't think we can remove runtime path arguments from ldflags
    >> now though; that might break existing applications.  We may
    >> need a new argument.

    Love> I'm will probably be just fine with you treating it as MIT
    Love> Kerberos 1.4.1 issue. May I ask what the the current
    Love> timeframe is ?

Shortly after IETF.