request: provide a canonical autoconf fragment for finding krb5 and/or gssapi
hartmans at MIT.EDU
Wed Feb 16 14:51:38 EST 2005
>>>>> "Love" == Love <lha at stacken.kth.se> writes:
Love> Sam Hartman <hartmans at mit.edu> writes:
>> I propose we treat both Derrick and Love's requests as 1.4.1
>> issues on the MIT side provided that we don't end up blocking
>> on any Heimdal coordination issues.
>> I don't think we can remove runtime path arguments from ldflags
>> now though; that might break existing applications. We may
>> need a new argument.
Love> I'm will probably be just fine with you treating it as MIT
Love> Kerberos 1.4.1 issue. May I ask what the the current
Love> timeframe is ?
Shortly after IETF.
More information about the krbdev