Debugging API for krb5

[Ken Raeburn]

On Thursday, Feb 5, 2004, at 17:52 US/Eastern, Derek Atkins wrote:
> But I still maintain 32 modules is more than sufficient for this case.
> You don't need to define a generic logging mechanism that gets used by
> everyone else -- you're just defining one for yourself.
>

This is certainly a good point.  If the form we come up with now allows 
for reasonable extensibility in the future, the details of the 
implementation shouldn't matter much.  (Though if we have people 
starting to put magic numbers into their config files, that could be a 
problem.)