kerberos port numbers
raeburn at MIT.EDU
Fri Aug 23 16:15:01 EDT 2002
> Sam Hartman wrote:
>> One question I have is how many machines out there still have 750
>> listed as kerberos in /etc/services?
Yes, that is kind of a key question. Hence my asking....
"Douglas E. Engert" <deengert at anl.gov> writes:
> How many clients actually use the /etc/services port to find the KDC?
> The krb5.conf file kdc = can have the port number, and the DNS SRV record
> can provide it. So even if its in /etc/services, it is actually used?
Most of the entries in the krb5.conf file we use at MIT have kdc
entries with no port numbers; in those cases, yes, /etc/services is
> Ken was asking about TCP support. The 750/tcp is not official, and I don't
> think anyone has ever used. Does Ken plain on not supporting multiple UDP
> services as well as TCP services?
Unless someone convinces me otherwise, I don't plan to try port 750
for TCP, but changing UDP seems like a bigger change, since we are
trying both ports now.
> Is there any plain to drop K4 support at the same time?
> Or at least not adding K4 support for TCP?
We aren't dropping krb4, but we don't plan on adding TCP support for
More information about the krbdev