[krbdev.mit.edu #3422] HPUX 11.11 Redefines SE - Causes telnetd deadlock

[Tom Yu via RT]

[nate.yocom at centrify.com - Mon Jun 19 14:48:30 2006]:

> > We have other files using SE; do they not run into the same 
> > problem?  If not, why not?  If so, we shouldn't fix it 
> > independently in every file if we can avoid it.
> 
> I haven't looked at this in some time, but from what I recall it was the
> particular set and order of includes in telnetd only that caused this to
> happen (or this was the only place where the use of an invalid SE
> resulted in a deadlock).

Does moving the inclusion of arpa/telnet.h to after the inclusion of
general.h help?  I don't have a HPUX 11 system to test with.  Also,
could you trace the inclusion chain resulting in the inclusion of
machine/cpu.h?