Issue with kvno
kaduk at MIT.EDU
Fri May 29 11:45:48 EDT 2015
I don't have a definite answer for you, but:
1.7 is very old.
4294967295 is 0xffffffff is -1 as a 32-bit twos-complement integer
255 is 0xff is -1 as an 8-bit twos-complement integer.
kvnos are supposed to be unsigned integers, but krb5 prior to 1.10 (and
evern moreso prior to 1.6) had bugs where they were treated as signed
On Thu, 28 May 2015, vishal wrote:
> I did not get any answer for my query:
> I see an issue with kvno with kerberos version 1.7 where linux server is
> sending the kvno to trusted domain as 4294967295 while it gets this as 255
> from home domain.
> Is this an known issue?
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:07 PM, vishal <vicky.recw at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I see an issue with kvno with kerberos version 1.7 where linux server is
> > sending the kvno to trusted domain as 4294967295 while it gets this as 255
> > from home domain.
> > Is this an known issue?
> > Thanks,
> > Vishal
> Kerberos mailing list Kerberos at mit.edu
More information about the Kerberos