Deprecated functions (1.3.4)
Mike Friedman
mikef at ack.Berkeley.EDU
Wed Sep 8 13:17:39 EDT 2004
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 at 12:59 (-0400), Sam Hartman wrote:
> I think you are a bit confused about the meaning of KRB5_DEPRECATED.
> It's a preprocessor symbol you should define in your code if you use any
> of the depricated functinos. We define it in our build because we still
> use some of these functions.
Sam,
Thanks! That's what I need to know (and, you're right, I was confused). I
just compiled one of my modules with KRB5_DEPRECATED set and I no longer
get the warning message (and the code appears to work).
> If you don't define it then you won't get prototypes for the
> functions.
>
> We do not plan to remove any functions during the 1.3.x code series.
> That is, if you see the function in 1.3.4, the earliest it could
> disappear is 1.4.
>
> As it turns out we don't plan to remove any of the depricated
> functions for 1.4.
That is all good to know.
Thanks again.
Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Friedman System and Network Security
mikef at ack.Berkeley.EDU 2484 Shattuck Avenue
1-510-642-1410 University of California at Berkeley
http://ack.Berkeley.EDU/~mikef http://security.berkeley.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Kerberos
mailing list