Transited Encoded field

[Gustavo V. G. C. Rios]

Sam Hartman wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo V G C Rios <gustavo.rios at terra.com.br> writes:
> 
>     Gustavo> Hi folks!  i wonder if in a hierarchically organized
>     Gustavo> realm path, the transited encoding field could be omited
>     Gustavo> (provide no node in the realm tree would be bypassed)?
>     Gustavo> Would this violate the protocol?
> 
> Yes doing so would violate the protocol.
> 
>     Gustavo> In RFC1510 it is said that a KDC may not to include a
>     Gustavo> realm in the transited encoded field, i.e., a third party
> Gustavo> realm! Would not this be a standard violation?
> 
> You seem to be doing enough work with Kerberos that you are really better off taking the following steps:
> 
> 1) subscribing to and reading the IETF working group list where
>    protocol discussions take place.
> 
> 2) Reading draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications instead of RFC
>    1510.
> 
> Start at http://www.ietf.org/, look for working groups and then look
> for Kerberos.  This will include mailing list instructions as well as
> pointers to the Kerberos drafts.

Dear gentleman,

thank you very much for your support. I will follow your instructions.

I am sorry to bother this list. I just thought this place was the right
one where i could have my questions answered. My mistaken. Once more,
THANK you very much for all your time and cooperation.

best regards.