which krb5 PAM module on Solaris 8?
Sam Hartman
hartmans at MIT.EDU
Mon Aug 4 13:53:37 EDT 2003
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Davidson <bdavids1 at gmu.edu> writes:
Brian> Why not use nsswitch for authorization? I'm assuming it's
Brian> available on Solaris since Sun developed it (I don't have
Brian> any Solaris boxes at the moment). Basically all password
Brian> file lookups are redirected to LDAP via nss_ldap. It seems
Brian> to me that authentication is best left to PAM, while
Brian> authorization is better handled by a hook into the system
Brian> calls that are used for authorization (i.e. what nsswitch
Brian> does).
Because existence in the password file should not be tied to
authorization. I might want (and in fact do) all my users to exist in
my password files so that ls works, so that I can do group to name
mappings, etc.
I do not want that to imply authorization.
Also, for things like time-of-day based authorization, having the user
suddenly drop out of the password file would be undesirable.
PAM has hooks for this; they work about as well as the rest of PAM.
More information about the Kerberos
mailing list