[ecco-support] Request for a specific configuration of ECCOv4

[Jones, Dan]

Hello,

Is there an ECCOv4 configuration/solution that avoids using the bulk formulae? That is, a solution that uses net heat flux as a control variable?

For context: I would like to attempt an adjoint reconstruction using net heat flux and wind stress. However, if we use the bulk formulae, there is a risk of double-counting (as pointed out by Yavor Kostov). Gael Forget suggested that avoiding the bulk formulae altogether could be a promising way to start.

Thanks for any help/guidance you can provide.

Many thanks,
Dan

--
Dr Dan Jones | Polar Oceans Team<https://www.bas.ac.uk/team/science-teams/oceans/> | BAS AI Lab<https://www.bas.ac.uk/project/ai>
British Antarctic Survey | NERC | UKRI | Cambridge
Website<http://www.danjonesocean.com/> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/DanJonesOcean>

I do *not* expect you to reply outside of your working hours.



This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named recipients. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or any of its attachments and should notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system.
UK Research and Innovation has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise risk of this email or any attachments containing viruses or malware but the recipient should carry out its own virus and malware checks before opening the attachments. UK Research and Innovation does not accept any liability for any losses or damages which the recipient may sustain due to presence of any viruses.
Opinions, conclusions or other information in this message and attachments that are not related directly to UK Research and Innovation business are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of UK Research and Innovation.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/ecco-support/attachments/20200331/f8110ab0/attachment.html