[ecco-support] [EXTERNAL] Request for a specific configuration of ECCOv4
Dan Jones
dcjones.work at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 04:49:35 EDT 2020
Hi all,
Yes, Paola's description is consistent with my understanding of the issue.
If we want to treat buoyancy flux and wind stress separately, then we
probably shouldn't use the bulk formulas, at least not "out of the box".
Buoyancy flux and wind stress are coupled through the bulk formulas.
This isn't an issue for most optimisation tasks or sensitivity studies.
It's more of an issue for adjoint reconstructions, for which it is arguably
conceptually cleaner to separate changes due to wind stress anomalies from
changes due to net buoyancy flux anomalies.
Thanks,
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/ecco-support/attachments/20200406/13068235/attachment.html
More information about the ecco-support
mailing list