[Dspace-general] Two suggested features for next release of Dspace
Stevan Harnad
harnad at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Mar 14 08:12:42 EST 2006
Hi Rob,
Can I make two suggestions for features that would be useful for the
next release of Dspace?
(1) The first you may have already: Can you have a separate tag
for the depositor and for the author(s) of each deposited item,
*together with the email addresses of each*?
There are many reasons why this will be useful, but a big one is the
second suggestion, below.
Every deposited dspace document presumably has a deposit field for
setting access privileges for the full-text, the three main ones being:
(i) Open Access [ie, public access web-wide]
(ii) Restricted Access, Institution-Internal only
(iii) Restricted Access, author/depositor and Archive staff only.
Alongside the deposit field for the two Restricted Access fields (ii, iii),
may I suggest that dspace add the following:
"Metadata will be visible web-wide and eprint-requesters will
be able to send the author an automated email request."
That is the second suggested feature:
(2) For every published paper that is in Restricted Access,
a box should appear alongside the metadata, into which any
eprint-requester can paste his name (optional) and email address
(mandatory) if he wishes to receive an email of the eprints. The
message is automatically sent to the *author* (not the depositor),
who receives an email with a URL on which he can click to have his
full-text automatically emailed to that requester.
This feature will be critically important in the next phase of institutional
self-archiving policy, in which immediate deposit will be mandatory but
access-setting will be left up to the author:
GENERIC MODEL FOR UNIVERSITY OPEN ACCESS SELF-ARCHIVING MANDATE
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/71-guid.html
For deposits that the author may elect to set as Restricted Access
for some period (e.g., if he wishes to abide by a journal's 6-month
embargo on public self-archiving -- a foolish move, on both sides,
but a contingency that will crop up for a while in the next phase),
the access-gap can be bridged meanwhile through this inconvenient and
indirect (but effective for OA) automated eprint email request-and-send
feature.
I hope this feature can be implemented quickly in dspace, as institutional
self-archiving policies will be drafted that are contingent on this
feature.
Best wishes,
Stevan Harnad
American Scientist Open Access Forum
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html
Chaire de recherche du Canada Professor of Cognitive Science
Ctr. de neuroscience de la cognition Dpt. Electronics & Computer Science
Université du Québec à Montréal University of Southampton
Montréal, Québec Highfield, Southampton
Canada H3C 3P8 SO17 1BJ United Kingdom
http://www.crsc.uqam.ca/ http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/
More information about the Dspace-general
mailing list