[catsoop-dev] Docs and version support

[adam j hartz]

Hi Maddie,

Thanks for pointing out those issues, and for the patches (and sorry for
the slow response).  Some comments inline below.

Thanks,
-Adam


> The docs one adjusts the example nginx configuration (`location
> /catsoop`) to match the surrounding documentation that seems to use
> `/cat-soop` to a much greater extent.

For the docs, I ended up making and pushing the opposite change, i.e.,
using /catsoop everywhere instead of /cat-soop.


> The patch also adds some additional info about the serving static
> files configuration that I was personally confused by a couple years
> ago.

Ah, good call.  That was indeed overly hard-coded.  I'm going to make a
couple of little tweaks to the wording, but I'll go ahead and put this
in, too.


> For the second diff, is catsoop still supporting 3.8 as the minimum
> version?

I think we should drop 3.8, and probably also 3.9.  3.8 reaches its EOL
a few months from now, and I don't think it's worth trying to support it
unless there's a compelling reason to.  I think all of the major
distributions have moved on to at least 3.10 if not 3.11, so that's
probably safe.  Are you still running 3.8 anywhere?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/catsoop-dev/attachments/20240626/88bd9d6d/attachment.sig>