[Tango-L] tango w list

[jan bares]

In all due respect, the proposal of tango-W makes little sense to me. "...Tango-W list for all of us ignored and un-included women.."?! All you need to do is to SUBSCRIBE and POST on the list, that's the way to overcome the "un-included"! Pontificators? Step in - most of the women need not be instructed how to deflate an ego. Women have been free to post on tango-L as much as they pleased. And should not second guess who would be interested in what they write. Tango-L has been a shining example of gender equality - we do not need to introduce any gender or leader/follower segregation. 
Jan
 
 
--- On Wed, 1/11/12, sherpal1 at aol.com <sherpal1 at aol.com> wrote:


From: sherpal1 at aol.com <sherpal1 at aol.com>
Subject: [Tango-L] tango w list
To: TANGO-L at mit.edu
Date: Wednesday, January 11, 2012, 10:16 PM


have paid attention to the request for good blogging about tango which 
no longer exits on Tango L...which was really just a venue for a good, 
identified and approved group of men to pontificate with one another 
about esoteric issues that either no one else identified with or were 
excluded from the dialoge because they were not part of the tango 
sucking club of self admirers..so I propose a new blogging entity for 
Tango L and TAngo A..how about a Tango-W...only for issues by, for and 
with women...if as a man you want to communicate, you must do so  only 
from the woman's/follower's point of view..

what do you think mr. moderator..how about a Tango-W list for all of us 
ignored and un-included women...i bet you will really have some 
activity here because women actually rejoin and  respond to one another 
to create threads, not just self indulgent platforms of opinion and 
prejudice.   sherrie

_______________________________________________
Tango-L mailing list
Tango-L at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l